TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a simplified malnutrition screening tool for hospitalized patients and evaluation of its inter-methods reliability
AU - Yun, Oak Hee
AU - Lee, Gyuhwi
AU - Park, Yoon Jung
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - Purpose: The current study was designed for development of a simplified malnutrition screening tool (SMST) for hospi-talized patients using readily available laboratory and patient information and for evaluation of its reliability compared to well-established tools, such as PGSGA and NRS-2002. Methods: Anthropometric and biochemical measurements, as well as a few subjective assessments, of 903 patients who were preclassified by their nutritional status according to PGS-GA were analyzed. Among them, a combination of factors, including age, BMI, albumin, cholesterol, total protein, hema-tocrit, and changes in body weight and food intake, were statistically selected as variables for SMST. Results: Accord-ing to SMST, 620 patients (68.7%) were classified as the normal group and 283 patients (31.3%) were classified as the malnutrition group. Significant differences in age, albumin, TLC, BMI, hemoglobin, hematocrit, total protein, cholesterol, and length of stay were observed between the two groups. For inter-methods reliability, the screening results by SMST were compared with those by PGSGA and NRS-2002. The comparison with PGSGA and NRS-2002 showed 'Substantial agreement' (sensitivity 94.4%, specificity 88.4%, ê = 0.747) and 'Moderate agreement' (sensitivity 96.1%, specificity 79.5%, ê = 0.505), respectively, indicating that SMST held high inter-methods reliability. Conclusion: In conclusion, SMST, based on readily available laboratory and patient information and simple subjective assessments on changes in food intake and body weight, may be a useful alternative tool with a simple but reliable risk index, especially in resource-limited domestic hospitals.
AB - Purpose: The current study was designed for development of a simplified malnutrition screening tool (SMST) for hospi-talized patients using readily available laboratory and patient information and for evaluation of its reliability compared to well-established tools, such as PGSGA and NRS-2002. Methods: Anthropometric and biochemical measurements, as well as a few subjective assessments, of 903 patients who were preclassified by their nutritional status according to PGS-GA were analyzed. Among them, a combination of factors, including age, BMI, albumin, cholesterol, total protein, hema-tocrit, and changes in body weight and food intake, were statistically selected as variables for SMST. Results: Accord-ing to SMST, 620 patients (68.7%) were classified as the normal group and 283 patients (31.3%) were classified as the malnutrition group. Significant differences in age, albumin, TLC, BMI, hemoglobin, hematocrit, total protein, cholesterol, and length of stay were observed between the two groups. For inter-methods reliability, the screening results by SMST were compared with those by PGSGA and NRS-2002. The comparison with PGSGA and NRS-2002 showed 'Substantial agreement' (sensitivity 94.4%, specificity 88.4%, ê = 0.747) and 'Moderate agreement' (sensitivity 96.1%, specificity 79.5%, ê = 0.505), respectively, indicating that SMST held high inter-methods reliability. Conclusion: In conclusion, SMST, based on readily available laboratory and patient information and simple subjective assessments on changes in food intake and body weight, may be a useful alternative tool with a simple but reliable risk index, especially in resource-limited domestic hospitals.
KW - Hospitalized patients
KW - Malnutrition
KW - Nutrition screening
KW - Nutritional status
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901016166&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4163/jnh.2014.47.2.124
DO - 10.4163/jnh.2014.47.2.124
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84901016166
SN - 2288-3886
VL - 47
SP - 124
EP - 133
JO - Journal of Nutrition and Health
JF - Journal of Nutrition and Health
IS - 2
ER -