TY - JOUR
T1 - Detection of incidental prostate cancer or urothelial carcinoma extension in urinary bladder cancer patients by using multiparametric MRI
T2 - A retrospective study using prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.0
AU - Yoon, Sang Eun
AU - Kang, Byung Chul
AU - Cho, Hyun Hae
AU - Park, Sanghui
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyrights © 2020 The Korean Society of Radiology
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - Purpose The study aimed to investigate the role of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) in predicting incidental prostate cancer (PCa) or urothelial carcinoma (UCa) extension in urinary bladder (UB) cancer patients. Materials and Methods A total of 72 UB cancer patients who underwent radical cystoprostatectomy and 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI before surgery were enrolled. PI-RADS v2 ratings were assigned by two independent radiologists. All prostate specimens were examined by a single pathologist. We compared the multiparametric MRI findings rated using PI-RADS v2 with the pathologic data. Results Of the 72 UB cancer patients, 29 had incidental PCa (40.3%) and 20 showed UCa extension (27.8%), with an overlap for 3 patients. With a score of 4 as the cut-off value for predicting incidental PCa, the diagnostic accuracy was 65.3%, specificity was 90.7%, and positive predictive value (PPV) was 66.7%. The diagnostic accuracy for incidental UCa extension was 47.2%, specificity was 92.3%, and PPV was 83.3%. Conclusion Despite the low diagnostic accuracy, the PPV and specificity were relatively high. Therefore, PI-RADS v2 scores of 1, 2, or 3 may help exclude the probability of incidental PCa or UCa extension.
AB - Purpose The study aimed to investigate the role of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) in predicting incidental prostate cancer (PCa) or urothelial carcinoma (UCa) extension in urinary bladder (UB) cancer patients. Materials and Methods A total of 72 UB cancer patients who underwent radical cystoprostatectomy and 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI before surgery were enrolled. PI-RADS v2 ratings were assigned by two independent radiologists. All prostate specimens were examined by a single pathologist. We compared the multiparametric MRI findings rated using PI-RADS v2 with the pathologic data. Results Of the 72 UB cancer patients, 29 had incidental PCa (40.3%) and 20 showed UCa extension (27.8%), with an overlap for 3 patients. With a score of 4 as the cut-off value for predicting incidental PCa, the diagnostic accuracy was 65.3%, specificity was 90.7%, and positive predictive value (PPV) was 66.7%. The diagnostic accuracy for incidental UCa extension was 47.2%, specificity was 92.3%, and PPV was 83.3%. Conclusion Despite the low diagnostic accuracy, the PPV and specificity were relatively high. Therefore, PI-RADS v2 scores of 1, 2, or 3 may help exclude the probability of incidental PCa or UCa extension.
KW - Cystectomy
KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
KW - Prostate Cancer
KW - Urinary Bladder Cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091079764&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3348/JKSR.2020.81.3.610
DO - 10.3348/JKSR.2020.81.3.610
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85091079764
SN - 1738-2637
VL - 81
SP - 610
EP - 619
JO - Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
JF - Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
IS - 3
ER -