TY - JOUR
T1 - Detection and characterization of small focal hepatic lesions (≤2.5 cm in diameter)
T2 - A comparison of diffusion-weighted images before and after administration of gadoxetic acid disodium at 3.0T
AU - Song, Kyoung Doo
AU - Kim, Young Kon
AU - Lee, Won Jae
AU - Lee, Min Woo
AU - Park, Min Jung
AU - Hwang, Jiyoung
AU - Lee, Mi Hee
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - Background: As diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is routinely incorporated into the standard clinical protocol, it is clinically relevant to determine whether DWI after gadoxetic acid is comparable to pre-contrast DWI, with regard to the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. Purpose: To compare DWI before and after administration of gadoxetic acid in the detection and characterization of small (≤2.5cm) focal hepatic lesions. Material and Methods: One hundred and fifty-eight patients with 237 focal hepatic lesions (≤2.5cm) (124 HCCs, 50 metastases, 2 cholangiocarcinomas, 43 hemangiomas, and 18 cysts) were included. DWIs were obtained before and after administration of gadoxetic acid. Non-breath-hold DWI was performed with b values of 0,100, and 800 s/mm 2. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), lesion-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of the liver and lesion were calculated. Lesion detection with each DWI was evaluated with alternative free-response receiver-operating characteristic analysis by two observers. The sensitivity of the characterization of focal hepatic lesions as solid (malignancy) or non-solid (benignity) with each DWI was calculated using a five-point confidence scale. Inter-observer agreement regarding lesion detection and characterization was evaluated using kappa statistics. Results: SNRs of the liver on post-contrast DWI were significantly lower than on unenhanced DWI at b = 800 s/mm 2 (P< 0.05). SNRs, CNRs, and ADCs of focal hepatic lesions were not significantly different between two DWIs (P > 0.05). The diagnostic accuracy (Az) for lesion detection and the sensitivity for lesion characterization did not show significant difference between two DWIs (P > 0.05). With regard to the detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions, the kappa values for two DWIs indicated good and excellent inter-observer agreement, respectively. Conclusion: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced DWI showed comparable diagnostic capability to unenhanced DWI for the detection and characterization of small focal hepatic lesions.
AB - Background: As diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is routinely incorporated into the standard clinical protocol, it is clinically relevant to determine whether DWI after gadoxetic acid is comparable to pre-contrast DWI, with regard to the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. Purpose: To compare DWI before and after administration of gadoxetic acid in the detection and characterization of small (≤2.5cm) focal hepatic lesions. Material and Methods: One hundred and fifty-eight patients with 237 focal hepatic lesions (≤2.5cm) (124 HCCs, 50 metastases, 2 cholangiocarcinomas, 43 hemangiomas, and 18 cysts) were included. DWIs were obtained before and after administration of gadoxetic acid. Non-breath-hold DWI was performed with b values of 0,100, and 800 s/mm 2. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), lesion-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of the liver and lesion were calculated. Lesion detection with each DWI was evaluated with alternative free-response receiver-operating characteristic analysis by two observers. The sensitivity of the characterization of focal hepatic lesions as solid (malignancy) or non-solid (benignity) with each DWI was calculated using a five-point confidence scale. Inter-observer agreement regarding lesion detection and characterization was evaluated using kappa statistics. Results: SNRs of the liver on post-contrast DWI were significantly lower than on unenhanced DWI at b = 800 s/mm 2 (P< 0.05). SNRs, CNRs, and ADCs of focal hepatic lesions were not significantly different between two DWIs (P > 0.05). The diagnostic accuracy (Az) for lesion detection and the sensitivity for lesion characterization did not show significant difference between two DWIs (P > 0.05). With regard to the detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions, the kappa values for two DWIs indicated good and excellent inter-observer agreement, respectively. Conclusion: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced DWI showed comparable diagnostic capability to unenhanced DWI for the detection and characterization of small focal hepatic lesions.
KW - Diffusion-weighted imaging
KW - Gd-EOB-DTPA
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861860177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1258/ar.2012.110437
DO - 10.1258/ar.2012.110437
M3 - Article
C2 - 22535883
AN - SCOPUS:84861860177
SN - 0284-1851
VL - 53
SP - 485
EP - 493
JO - Acta Radiologica
JF - Acta Radiologica
IS - 5
ER -