Dangerous Towers, Harmless Phones? Swiss Newspaper Coverage of the Risk Associated With Non-Ionizing Radiation

Peter J. Schulz, Uwe Hartung, Nicola Diviani, Simone Keller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article addresses the paradox that society seems to be concerned with radiation emissions from cell phone towers rather than with emissions from cell phones themselves. Experts, however, consider cell phones riskier than towers. The reasons for this paradox are likely to be rooted in psychological mechanisms of risk perception, but communication may also play a role. A content analysis of Swiss newspapers shows that they cover radiation in ways that legitimize worries about phones and towers, but they talk about towers six times more often than phones, suggesting that the risk comes from the towers rather than the phones. The differences in attention can be explained by journalists' routine reliance on news sources from the authorities and on discernable events, such as committee meetings, construction, and opening ceremonies. The study also finds that representatives of politics, administration, and business are cited in ways that often delegitimize worries about radiation, but coverage often legitimizes worries when these groups become the object of coverage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-70
Number of pages18
JournalAtlantic Journal of Communication
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dangerous Towers, Harmless Phones? Swiss Newspaper Coverage of the Risk Associated With Non-Ionizing Radiation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this