Abstract
Recently in Korea, where triple therapy is accepted as the first‐line Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication treatment, antibiotic resistance to clarithromycin has increased considerably, resulting in eradication rates of less than 80%. We investigated the efficacy of tailored therapy after a clarithromycin resistance test compared with empirical therapy for H. pylori eradication. The costeffectiveness of H. pylori eradication success was evaluated according to the average medical cost per patient. A total of 364 patients were enrolled in the study. The first‐line H. pylori eradication rate was significantly higher in patients who received tailored therapy than in those who received empirical therapy. The total medical costs for the tailored and empirical groups were 46,374 Won and 53,528 Won. The total treatment period for each ultimately successful eradication in the tailored group was 79.8 ± 2.8 days, which is shorter than that of the empirical group (99.2 ± 7.4 days). The rate of eradication‐related adverse events for the tailored group and empirical group was 12.9% and 14.8%, respectively. Tailored therapy could be a useful option to achieve a higher successful eradication rate, shorter treatment periods, and lower medical costs than empirical therapy in the era of increasing antibiotic resistance.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 2619 |
Journal | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 12 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2 Jun 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 by the authors.
Keywords
- Antibiotic resistance
- Empirical
- Eradication
- Helicobacter pylori
- Tailored