Abstract
The authors regret to inform that several mistakes were found in theTable 2. For the reference [137], 625 mA g-1 is correct constant current operation instead of 2500 mA g-1. For the reference [138], the ASAR is changed to not applicable (n.a). For the reference [140], representative salt adsorption capacity was rounded to 8.8 mg g-1. The previous and corrected Table 2 are shown below. Previous Table 2 Salt adsorption capacity (SAC)and average salt removal rate (ASAR)of Faradaic electrodes used in HCDI system [Table presented]a Operational modes include constant voltage (CV)and constant current (CC)operation Corrected Version The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 433-434 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Separation and Purification Technology |
Volume | 221 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - 15 Aug 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019
Keywords
- Capacitive deionization
- Electrochemical ion separation
- Faradaic reaction
- Non-faradaic reaction