TY - JOUR
T1 - Computer-aided detection of lung nodules
T2 - Influence of the image reconstruction kernel for computer-aided detection performance
AU - Hwang, Jiyoung
AU - Chung, Myung Jin
AU - Bae, Younga
AU - Shin, Kyung Min
AU - Jeong, Sun Young
AU - Lee, Kyung Soo
PY - 2010/1
Y1 - 2010/1
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the relationship between a computed tomographic reconstruction kernel and the sensitivity of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for lung nodule detection. Methods: We retrospectively studied 36 consecutive patients with no known pulmonary nodules who underwent low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening with 3 different reconstruction kernels (B, C, and L). All series were reviewed with a commercial CAD system for lung nodule detection. Results: The 36 scans showed 231 uncalcified nodules (170 micronodules and 61 nodules). There was little variation of sensitivities for each series (82%, 88%, and 82% for the nodules of B, C, and L, respectively). When the results of 2 series were combined, sensitivities were boosted (B + C, 89%; B + L, 95%; and C + L, 96% for the nodules). Conclusions: Sensitivity of the CAD system was influenced by the selection of the reconstruction kernel. By combining data from 2 different kernels, CAD sensitivity can be elevated without further patient radiation exposure.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the relationship between a computed tomographic reconstruction kernel and the sensitivity of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for lung nodule detection. Methods: We retrospectively studied 36 consecutive patients with no known pulmonary nodules who underwent low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening with 3 different reconstruction kernels (B, C, and L). All series were reviewed with a commercial CAD system for lung nodule detection. Results: The 36 scans showed 231 uncalcified nodules (170 micronodules and 61 nodules). There was little variation of sensitivities for each series (82%, 88%, and 82% for the nodules of B, C, and L, respectively). When the results of 2 series were combined, sensitivities were boosted (B + C, 89%; B + L, 95%; and C + L, 96% for the nodules). Conclusions: Sensitivity of the CAD system was influenced by the selection of the reconstruction kernel. By combining data from 2 different kernels, CAD sensitivity can be elevated without further patient radiation exposure.
KW - CT reconstruction kernel
KW - Combined kernel
KW - Computer-aided detection (CAD)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76449105648&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181b5c630
DO - 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181b5c630
M3 - Article
C2 - 20118719
AN - SCOPUS:76449105648
SN - 0363-8715
VL - 34
SP - 31
EP - 34
JO - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
JF - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
IS - 1
ER -