Comparison of the effects of a bioceramic and conventional resin-based sealers on postoperative pain after nonsurgical root canal treatment: A randomized controlled clinical study

Kiche Shim, Young Eun Jang, Yemi Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: This clinical trial aimed to compare the effects of bioceramic sealer and resin-based sealer on the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain. Methods: Patients with anterior teeth or premolars requiring root canal treatment were assigned to group 1 (n = 51). Those with molars requiring treatment were assigned to group 2 (n = 57). In groups 1En and 2En, root canals were obturated with Endoseal MTA using the single-cone technique. In groups 1AH and 2AH, the sealer used was AH Plus with the continuous wave technique. On the day of canal filling, each patient was instructed to indicate their pain intensity over the 7 day postoperative period, at rest and, while biting, using a visual analog scale. Results: There was no significant difference in the incidence or intensity of postoperative pain between the Endoseal MTA and AH Plus groups during the 7 day postoperative period (p > 0.05). Less time was needed to seal the root canals with Endoseal MTA, especially in group 2 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Endoseal MTA and AH Plus had similar effects on the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain. The obturation time was shorter when using Endoseal MTA compared to AH Plus.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2661
JournalMaterials
Volume14
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 May 2021

Keywords

  • Bioceramic sealer
  • Postoperative pain
  • Resin-based sealer
  • Root canal sealer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the effects of a bioceramic and conventional resin-based sealers on postoperative pain after nonsurgical root canal treatment: A randomized controlled clinical study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this