Abstract
Urinary cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is an attractive body fluid for liquid biopsy. In this study, we compared the efficiencies of four commercial kits for urinary cell-free DNA (cfDNA) isolation and of various sample storage conditions. Urinary cfDNA was isolated from 10 healthy individuals using four commercial kits: QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (QC; Qiagen), MagMAX- Cell-Free DNA Isolation Kit (MM; Applied Biosystems), Urine Cell-Free Circulating DNA Purification Midi Kit (NU; Norgen Biotek), and Quick-DNA- Urine Kit (ZQ; Zymo Research). To assess the isolation efficiency, an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer with High Sensitivity DNA chips was used, and cfDNA yield was defined as the amount of cfDNA obtained from 1 mL of urine. MM and QC provided the highest cfDNA yield in the 50-300 bp range, and MM and NU gave the highest cfDNA yield in the 50-100 bp range. In particular, the NU kit was efficient for isolation of more fragmented cfDNA in the range of 50-100 bp with the lowest cellular genomic DNA contamination. ZQ had the best cost-efficiency for isolating the same amount of urinary cfDNA. Samples stored at -70 °C with the addition of 10 mM EDTA resulted in the highest cfDNA yield 3 months after sample collection.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 234 |
Journal | Diagnostics |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Keywords
- Commercial kit
- Liquid biopsy
- Urinary cell DNA