Abstract
Three materials are directly compared for their potential for biogas purification: 13X zeolite, microporous activated carbon and mesoporous activated carbon impregnated with polyethyleneimine. The amine-impregnated material shows the highest selectivity for CO2 over CH4 but this should be balanced by the higher operating temperature required. All three materials could be used for biogas purification with the advantages and diasadvantages clearly presented.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1473-1479 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Journal of Porous Materials |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Dec 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Acknowledgements This work has been performed with financial support from the EPSRC AMPGas project EP/J0277X/1. We thank Rachel Rayne for initial work on the preparation of the meso-AC material. EC thanks JSPS and the University of Nagoya for support and hospitality while this manuscript was being written. To comply with RCUK requirements, the raw experimental data used in the paper can be found at http://hdl.handle.net/10283/2335.
Funding Information:
This work has been performed with financial support from the EPSRC AMPGas project EP/J0277X/1. We thank Rachel Rayne for initial work on the preparation of the meso-AC material. EC thanks JSPS and the University of Nagoya for support and hospitality while this manuscript was being written. To comply with RCUK requirements, the raw experimental data used in the paper can be found at http://hdl.handle.net/10283/2335.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, The Author(s).
Keywords
- Adsorption
- Biogas
- CO
- Impregnation
- Porous carbon