Comparison of amine-impregnated mesoporous carbon with microporous activated carbon and 13X zeolite for biogas purification

J. A.A. Gibson; A. V. Gromov; S. Brandani; E. E.B. Campbell

doi:10.1007/s10934-017-0387-0

Comparison of amine-impregnated mesoporous carbon with microporous activated carbon and 13X zeolite for biogas purification

J. A.A. Gibson, A. V. Gromov, S. Brandani, E. E.B. Campbell

Department of Physics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Three materials are directly compared for their potential for biogas purification: 13X zeolite, microporous activated carbon and mesoporous activated carbon impregnated with polyethyleneimine. The amine-impregnated material shows the highest selectivity for CO₂ over CH₄ but this should be balanced by the higher operating temperature required. All three materials could be used for biogas purification with the advantages and diasadvantages clearly presented.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1473-1479
Number of pages	7
Journal	Journal of Porous Materials
Volume	24
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-017-0387-0
State	Published - 1 Dec 2017

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgements This work has been performed with financial support from the EPSRC AMPGas project EP/J0277X/1. We thank Rachel Rayne for initial work on the preparation of the meso-AC material. EC thanks JSPS and the University of Nagoya for support and hospitality while this manuscript was being written. To comply with RCUK requirements, the raw experimental data used in the paper can be found at http://hdl.handle.net/10283/2335.

Funding Information:
This work has been performed with financial support from the EPSRC AMPGas project EP/J0277X/1. We thank Rachel Rayne for initial work on the preparation of the meso-AC material. EC thanks JSPS and the University of Nagoya for support and hospitality while this manuscript was being written. To comply with RCUK requirements, the raw experimental data used in the paper can be found at http://hdl.handle.net/10283/2335.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, The Author(s).

Keywords

Adsorption
Biogas
CO
Impregnation
Porous carbon

Access to Document

10.1007/s10934-017-0387-0

Cite this

@article{d4e2ff912f79471e96c65bf249737567,

title = "Comparison of amine-impregnated mesoporous carbon with microporous activated carbon and 13X zeolite for biogas purification",

abstract = "Three materials are directly compared for their potential for biogas purification: 13X zeolite, microporous activated carbon and mesoporous activated carbon impregnated with polyethyleneimine. The amine-impregnated material shows the highest selectivity for CO2 over CH4 but this should be balanced by the higher operating temperature required. All three materials could be used for biogas purification with the advantages and diasadvantages clearly presented.",

keywords = "Adsorption, Biogas, CO, Impregnation, Porous carbon",

author = "Gibson, {J. A.A.} and Gromov, {A. V.} and S. Brandani and Campbell, {E. E.B.}",

note = "Funding Information: Acknowledgements This work has been performed with financial support from the EPSRC AMPGas project EP/J0277X/1. We thank Rachel Rayne for initial work on the preparation of the meso-AC material. EC thanks JSPS and the University of Nagoya for support and hospitality while this manuscript was being written. To comply with RCUK requirements, the raw experimental data used in the paper can be found at http://hdl.handle.net/10283/2335. Funding Information: This work has been performed with financial support from the EPSRC AMPGas project EP/J0277X/1. We thank Rachel Rayne for initial work on the preparation of the meso-AC material. EC thanks JSPS and the University of Nagoya for support and hospitality while this manuscript was being written. To comply with RCUK requirements, the raw experimental data used in the paper can be found at http://hdl.handle.net/10283/2335. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017, The Author(s).",

year = "2017",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s10934-017-0387-0",

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "1473--1479",

journal = "Journal of Porous Materials",

issn = "1380-2224",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of amine-impregnated mesoporous carbon with microporous activated carbon and 13X zeolite for biogas purification

AU - Gibson, J. A.A.

AU - Gromov, A. V.

AU - Brandani, S.

AU - Campbell, E. E.B.

N1 - Funding Information: Acknowledgements This work has been performed with financial support from the EPSRC AMPGas project EP/J0277X/1. We thank Rachel Rayne for initial work on the preparation of the meso-AC material. EC thanks JSPS and the University of Nagoya for support and hospitality while this manuscript was being written. To comply with RCUK requirements, the raw experimental data used in the paper can be found at http://hdl.handle.net/10283/2335. Funding Information: This work has been performed with financial support from the EPSRC AMPGas project EP/J0277X/1. We thank Rachel Rayne for initial work on the preparation of the meso-AC material. EC thanks JSPS and the University of Nagoya for support and hospitality while this manuscript was being written. To comply with RCUK requirements, the raw experimental data used in the paper can be found at http://hdl.handle.net/10283/2335. Publisher Copyright: © 2017, The Author(s).

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Three materials are directly compared for their potential for biogas purification: 13X zeolite, microporous activated carbon and mesoporous activated carbon impregnated with polyethyleneimine. The amine-impregnated material shows the highest selectivity for CO2 over CH4 but this should be balanced by the higher operating temperature required. All three materials could be used for biogas purification with the advantages and diasadvantages clearly presented.

AB - Three materials are directly compared for their potential for biogas purification: 13X zeolite, microporous activated carbon and mesoporous activated carbon impregnated with polyethyleneimine. The amine-impregnated material shows the highest selectivity for CO2 over CH4 but this should be balanced by the higher operating temperature required. All three materials could be used for biogas purification with the advantages and diasadvantages clearly presented.

KW - Adsorption

KW - Biogas

KW - CO

KW - Impregnation

KW - Porous carbon

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013212917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10934-017-0387-0

DO - 10.1007/s10934-017-0387-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85013212917

SN - 1380-2224

VL - 24

SP - 1473

EP - 1479

JO - Journal of Porous Materials

JF - Journal of Porous Materials

IS - 6

ER -

Comparison of amine-impregnated mesoporous carbon with microporous activated carbon and 13X zeolite for biogas purification

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this