Clinical experience with distal transradial access for endovascular treatment of various noncoronary interventions in a multicenter study

Sung Eun Park, Soo Buem Cho, Hye Jin Baek, Jin Il Moon, Kyeong Hwa Ryu, Ji Young Ha, Sangmin Lee, Jungho Won, Jong Hwa Ahn, Ran Kim, Sun Young Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations


Background Transradial access is a well-known alternative to conventional transfemoral access for interventional procedures. Recently, transradial access through the “snuffbox”, which lies in the radial dorsal aspect of the hand, has been introduced as a new technique with positional versatility. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical feasibility and safety of distal transradial access for interventional procedures in a retrospective, multicenter study. Material & methods Distal transradial access was attempted in 46 patients (36 men and 10 women; mean age, 64 years) who underwent 47 consecutive procedures from January 2018 to December 2019. Procedures included chemoembolization (19/47, 40.4%), bronchial artery embolization (7/47, 14.9%), renal intervention (3/47, 6.4%), arteriovenous fistula angioplasty (7/47, 14.9%), subclavian artery stenting (5/47, 10.6%), other embolization (5/47, 10.6%), and uterine artery embolization (1/47, 2.1%). We recorded the success rate of the procedures, complications, and postprocedural hemostasis time during the follow-up period. Results The technical success of distal transradial access without major complications was 97.9% (46/47). Of the 46 patients, one patient (2.2%) had a minor complication, which was a thrombotic segmental occlusion of the distal radial artery. Of the enrolled patients, only one patient did not complete the transradial access procedure via the snuffbox because the left proximal subclavian artery was occluded and a crossover to conventional transfemoral access was performed. The mean postprocedural hemostasis time was 131.7 minutes (range, 120–360 minutes). Conclusion Distal transradial access can be a valid option for the endovascular treatment of various noncoronary interventions with technical feasibility and safety.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0237798
JournalPLoS ONE
Issue number8 August 2020
StatePublished - Aug 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Park et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical experience with distal transradial access for endovascular treatment of various noncoronary interventions in a multicenter study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this