TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical decision fatigue
T2 - A systematic and scoping review with meta-synthesis
AU - Grignoli, Nicola
AU - Manoni, Greta
AU - Gianini, Jvan
AU - Schulz, Peter
AU - Gabutti, Luca
AU - Petrocchi, Serena
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025.
PY - 2025/2/8
Y1 - 2025/2/8
N2 - Objective Decision fatigue (DF) can lead to impaired judgement, decreased diagnostic accuracy and increased likelihood of medical errors. Research on DF is scarce, and little is known about its nature in the clinical context. The objective of the present review was to provide a comprehensive framework to understand how the construct of DF in medical settings has been defined and measured. This review aimed to understand DF determinants and consequences and capture motivational factors overlooked in the existing reviews. Design Systematic and scoping review (ScR) with meta-synthesis. Eligibility criteria Empirical and non-empirical papers on clinical DF or related constructs directly impacting clinical decision-making were considered, with doctors of all ages, sexes and nationalities as participants. The Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses scoping review checklist has been applied and checked. Information sources Six databases were systematically searched by two independent researchers according to a predefined set of keywords. Results 43 papers were included, of which 25 were empirical. The quantitative studies outnumber the qualitative ones and primarily involved residents in Europe/UK and North America. Internal medicine and primary care were the most studied disciplines. Only one sequential cross-sectional study measured DF in the medical setting, and all other studies addressed the construct indirectly. A conceptual analysis of clinical DF, including narrative contributions, a thematic analysis of the data extracted and a meta-synthesis, is provided. Clinical DF was investigated mostly by individual risk factors analysed through multiple intertwined determinants involving cognitive, emotional, behavioural, social and ethical aspects. Relevant risks, protective factors and negative outcomes circularly increasing DF are outlined. Conclusions The review gives solid arguments for developing a clear and coherent definition of clinical DF that allows the implementation of preventive targeted intervention.
AB - Objective Decision fatigue (DF) can lead to impaired judgement, decreased diagnostic accuracy and increased likelihood of medical errors. Research on DF is scarce, and little is known about its nature in the clinical context. The objective of the present review was to provide a comprehensive framework to understand how the construct of DF in medical settings has been defined and measured. This review aimed to understand DF determinants and consequences and capture motivational factors overlooked in the existing reviews. Design Systematic and scoping review (ScR) with meta-synthesis. Eligibility criteria Empirical and non-empirical papers on clinical DF or related constructs directly impacting clinical decision-making were considered, with doctors of all ages, sexes and nationalities as participants. The Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses scoping review checklist has been applied and checked. Information sources Six databases were systematically searched by two independent researchers according to a predefined set of keywords. Results 43 papers were included, of which 25 were empirical. The quantitative studies outnumber the qualitative ones and primarily involved residents in Europe/UK and North America. Internal medicine and primary care were the most studied disciplines. Only one sequential cross-sectional study measured DF in the medical setting, and all other studies addressed the construct indirectly. A conceptual analysis of clinical DF, including narrative contributions, a thematic analysis of the data extracted and a meta-synthesis, is provided. Clinical DF was investigated mostly by individual risk factors analysed through multiple intertwined determinants involving cognitive, emotional, behavioural, social and ethical aspects. Relevant risks, protective factors and negative outcomes circularly increasing DF are outlined. Conclusions The review gives solid arguments for developing a clear and coherent definition of clinical DF that allows the implementation of preventive targeted intervention.
KW - Health Policy
KW - Physicians, Primary Care
KW - Psychology, Medical
KW - Public Health
KW - Quality Improvement
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85217449297
U2 - 10.1136/fmch-2024-003033
DO - 10.1136/fmch-2024-003033
M3 - Article
C2 - 39922690
AN - SCOPUS:85217449297
SN - 2305-6983
VL - 13
JO - Family Medicine and Community Health
JF - Family Medicine and Community Health
IS - 1
M1 - e003033
ER -