TY - JOUR
T1 - Cangrelor With and Without Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
AU - CHAMPION Investigators
AU - Vaduganathan, Muthiah
AU - Harrington, Robert A.
AU - Stone, Gregg W.
AU - Deliargyris, Efthymios N.
AU - Steg, Ph Gabriel
AU - Gibson, C. Michael
AU - Hamm, Christian W.
AU - Price, Matthew J.
AU - Menozzi, Alberto
AU - Prats, Jayne
AU - Elkin, Steven
AU - Mahaffey, Kenneth W.
AU - White, Harvey D.
AU - Bhatt, Deepak L.
AU - Cura, Fernando
AU - Ballarino, Miguel
AU - Damonte, Anibal Agustín
AU - Grinfeld, Diego
AU - Álvarez, Carlos Alejandro
AU - Fernandez, Alberto
AU - Farshid, Ahmad
AU - Gunalingam, Brendan
AU - Jeurgens, Craig
AU - Lowe, Harry
AU - Hallani, Hisham
AU - Nelson, Greg
AU - New, Gishel
AU - Dick, Ronald
AU - Lefkovits, Jeffrey
AU - Duffy, Stephen
AU - Bett, Nick
AU - Yadav, Raibhan
AU - Garrahy, Paul
AU - Lehman, Ron
AU - Aylward, Philip
AU - Horowitz, John
AU - Worthley, Matthew
AU - Cross, David
AU - Rankin, Jaime
AU - Thompson, Peter
AU - Roberts-Thomson, Phil
AU - Cross, David
AU - Jayasinghe, Rohan
AU - Aroney, Con
AU - Huber, Kurt
AU - Leisch, Franz
AU - Altenberger, Johann
AU - Gaul, Georg
AU - Neunteufl, Thomas
AU - Pyun, Wook Bum
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2017/1/17
Y1 - 2017/1/17
N2 - Background Cangrelor, an intravenous, reversible P2Y12 antagonist, is approved for use in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Objectives This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cangrelor compared with clopidogrel in subgroups that did and did not receive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs). Methods This pooled, patient-level analysis of the 3 CHAMPION (Cangrelor versus Standard Therapy to Achieve Optimal Management of Platelet Inhibition) trials analyzed all randomized patients who underwent PCI and received the study drug (n = 24,902). Only bailout/rescue GPI use was permitted, except in CHAMPION PCI, in which routine or bailout/rescue GPI use was at the site investigator's discretion. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis at 48 h after randomization. Results Overall, 3,173 patients (12.7%) received a GPI, most commonly eptifibatide (69.4%). Despite variation in indications for GPIs, baseline characteristics were well balanced between the cangrelor and clopidogrel arms in subsets receiving and not receiving GPIs. Rates of the primary composite endpoint were lower with cangrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients who did (4.9% vs. 6.5%; odds ratio [OR]: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55 to 1.01) or did not receive a GPI (3.6% vs. 4.4%; OR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.94; Pint = 0.55). Cangrelor did not increase the primary safety endpoint, GUSTO-defined severe/life-threatening bleeding, in patients who did (0.4% vs. 0.5%; OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.99) or did not receive GPIs (0.2% vs. 0.1%; OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 0.80 to 3.04; Pint = 0.21). GPI use was associated with increased risk of bleeding in both treatment arms. Conclusions Cangrelor's efficacy in reducing ischemic complications in patients undergoing PCI was maintained irrespective of GPI administration. GPI use was associated with substantially higher bleeding rates, regardless of the randomization to cangrelor or clopidogrel.
AB - Background Cangrelor, an intravenous, reversible P2Y12 antagonist, is approved for use in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Objectives This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cangrelor compared with clopidogrel in subgroups that did and did not receive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs). Methods This pooled, patient-level analysis of the 3 CHAMPION (Cangrelor versus Standard Therapy to Achieve Optimal Management of Platelet Inhibition) trials analyzed all randomized patients who underwent PCI and received the study drug (n = 24,902). Only bailout/rescue GPI use was permitted, except in CHAMPION PCI, in which routine or bailout/rescue GPI use was at the site investigator's discretion. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis at 48 h after randomization. Results Overall, 3,173 patients (12.7%) received a GPI, most commonly eptifibatide (69.4%). Despite variation in indications for GPIs, baseline characteristics were well balanced between the cangrelor and clopidogrel arms in subsets receiving and not receiving GPIs. Rates of the primary composite endpoint were lower with cangrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients who did (4.9% vs. 6.5%; odds ratio [OR]: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55 to 1.01) or did not receive a GPI (3.6% vs. 4.4%; OR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.94; Pint = 0.55). Cangrelor did not increase the primary safety endpoint, GUSTO-defined severe/life-threatening bleeding, in patients who did (0.4% vs. 0.5%; OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.99) or did not receive GPIs (0.2% vs. 0.1%; OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 0.80 to 3.04; Pint = 0.21). GPI use was associated with increased risk of bleeding in both treatment arms. Conclusions Cangrelor's efficacy in reducing ischemic complications in patients undergoing PCI was maintained irrespective of GPI administration. GPI use was associated with substantially higher bleeding rates, regardless of the randomization to cangrelor or clopidogrel.
KW - antiplatelet therapy
KW - bleeding
KW - coronary artery disease
KW - outcomes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008627203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.055
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.055
M3 - Article
C2 - 28081827
AN - SCOPUS:85008627203
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 69
SP - 176
EP - 185
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 2
ER -