Abstract
In this paper two burn-in procedures for a general failure model are considered. There are two types of failure in the general failure model. One is Type I failure (minor failure) which can be removed by a minimal repair or a complete repair and the other is Type II failure (catastrophic failure) which can be removed only by a complete repair. During a burn-in process, with burn-in Procedure I, the failed component is repaired completely regardless of the type of failure, whereas, with burn-in Procedure II, only minimal repair is done for the Type I failure and a complete repair is performed for the Type II failure. In field use, the component is replaced by a new burned-in component at the 'field use age' T or at the time of the first Type II failure, whichever occurs first. Under the model, the problems of determining optimal burn-in time and optimal replacement policy are considered. The two burn-in procedures are compared in cases when both the procedures are applicable.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 542-553 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Journal of Applied Probability |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2001 |
Keywords
- Bathtub-shaped failure rate
- Burn-in
- General failure model
- Optimal burn-in
- Replacement policy