Attoampere Level Leakage Current in Chemical Vapor Deposition-Grown Monolayer MoS2 Dynamic Random-Access Memory in Trap-Assisted Tunneling Limit

Jisoo Seok, Jae Eun Seo, Dae Kyu Lee, Joon Young Kwak, Jiwon Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

MoS2, one of the most researched two-dimensional semiconductor materials, has great potential as the channel material in dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) due to the low leakage current inherited from the atomically thin thickness, high band gap, and heavy effective mass. In this work, we fabricate one-transistor-one-capacitor (1T1C) DRAM using chemical vapor deposition (CVD)-grown monolayer (ML) MoS2 in large area and confirm the ultralow leakage current of approximately 10−18 A/μm, significantly lower than the previous report (10−15 A/μm) in two-transistor-zero-capacitor (2T0C) DRAM based on a few-layer MoS2 flake. Through rigorous analysis of leakage current considering thermionic emission, tunneling at the source/drain, Shockley−Read−Hall recombination, and trap-assisted tunneling (TAT) current, the TAT current is identified as the primary source of leakage current. These findings highlight the potential of CVD-grown ML MoS2 to extend the retention time in DRAM and provide a deep understanding of the leakage current sources in MoS2 1T1C DRAM for further optimization to minimize the leakage current.(Figure presented.)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2458-2467
Number of pages10
JournalACS Nano
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 21 Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Chemical Society.

Keywords

  • DRAM
  • leakage current
  • MoS
  • Shockley−Read−Hall recombination
  • thermionic emission
  • trap-assisted tunneling current
  • tunneling current

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Attoampere Level Leakage Current in Chemical Vapor Deposition-Grown Monolayer MoS2 Dynamic Random-Access Memory in Trap-Assisted Tunneling Limit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this