TY - JOUR
T1 - Anterior capsulolabral lesions combined with supraspinatus tendon tears
T2 - Biomechanical effects of the pathologic condition and repair in human cadaveric shoulders
AU - Shin, Sang Jin
AU - Yoo, Jae Chul
AU - McGarry, Michelle H.
AU - Jun, Bong Jae
AU - Lee, Thay Q.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors report the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding in relation to this article: National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2010-013) and U.S. Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development and Merit Review. Anchors were donated by Arthrex.
PY - 2013/9
Y1 - 2013/9
N2 - Purpose: Our purpose was to investigate the effect of supraspinatus tendon tear combined with anterior capsulolabral injury on glenohumeral joint biomechanics and to identify which structures should be repaired when both pathologic conditions are present. Methods: Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested on a custom system. Five conditions were tested: intact supraspinatus full-thickness tear, supraspinatus tear combined with Bankart lesion, supraspinatus repair, and supraspinatus repair combined with Bankart repair. Rotational range of motion, glenohumeral kinematics, and the force required for anteroinferior dislocation were measured at 30° and 60° of glenohumeral abduction. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Bankart lesions combined with supraspinatus tears significantly increased total rotational range of motion (7.6° ± 6.3° at 30° of glenohumeral abduction and 14.1° ± 10.3° at 60° of glenohumeral abduction; P < .05). Bankart lesions combined with supraspinatus tears also significantly decreased the force required for dislocation normalized to range of motion (26.6% ± 21.0% at 60° of abduction) compared with intact shoulders (P = .04). Bankart repair combined with supraspinatus repair restored range of motion and the force required for dislocation; however, Bankart repair combined with supraspinatus repair shifted the humeral head posteriorly at the midrange of rotation in 30° and 60° of abduction (P < .05). Conclusions: Supraspinatus tendon tears combined with Bankart lesions increased humeral rotational range of motion and decreased the force required for dislocation. Repair of both pathologic conditions successfully restored range of motion and increased the force required for dislocation. Clinical Relevance: Both supraspinatus tendon and anterior labral repair are suggested for patients with combined Bankart lesions and supraspinatus tears to restore shoulder function and possibly prevent recurrent dislocation. However, when repairing both pathologic conditions, care should be taken not to overtighten the joint, which may lead to stiffness or osteoarthritis.
AB - Purpose: Our purpose was to investigate the effect of supraspinatus tendon tear combined with anterior capsulolabral injury on glenohumeral joint biomechanics and to identify which structures should be repaired when both pathologic conditions are present. Methods: Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested on a custom system. Five conditions were tested: intact supraspinatus full-thickness tear, supraspinatus tear combined with Bankart lesion, supraspinatus repair, and supraspinatus repair combined with Bankart repair. Rotational range of motion, glenohumeral kinematics, and the force required for anteroinferior dislocation were measured at 30° and 60° of glenohumeral abduction. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Bankart lesions combined with supraspinatus tears significantly increased total rotational range of motion (7.6° ± 6.3° at 30° of glenohumeral abduction and 14.1° ± 10.3° at 60° of glenohumeral abduction; P < .05). Bankart lesions combined with supraspinatus tears also significantly decreased the force required for dislocation normalized to range of motion (26.6% ± 21.0% at 60° of abduction) compared with intact shoulders (P = .04). Bankart repair combined with supraspinatus repair restored range of motion and the force required for dislocation; however, Bankart repair combined with supraspinatus repair shifted the humeral head posteriorly at the midrange of rotation in 30° and 60° of abduction (P < .05). Conclusions: Supraspinatus tendon tears combined with Bankart lesions increased humeral rotational range of motion and decreased the force required for dislocation. Repair of both pathologic conditions successfully restored range of motion and increased the force required for dislocation. Clinical Relevance: Both supraspinatus tendon and anterior labral repair are suggested for patients with combined Bankart lesions and supraspinatus tears to restore shoulder function and possibly prevent recurrent dislocation. However, when repairing both pathologic conditions, care should be taken not to overtighten the joint, which may lead to stiffness or osteoarthritis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891703411&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.05.031
DO - 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.05.031
M3 - Article
C2 - 23910002
AN - SCOPUS:84891703411
SN - 0749-8063
VL - 29
SP - 1492
EP - 1497
JO - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
JF - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
IS - 9
ER -