TY - JOUR
T1 - An empirical test of the Health Empowerment Model
T2 - Does patient empowerment moderate the effect of health literacy on health status?
AU - Náfrádi, Lilla
AU - Nakamoto, Kent
AU - Csabai, Márta
AU - Papp-Zipernovszky, Orsolya
AU - Schulz, Peter J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - Objective: The Health Empowerment Model (Schulz & Nakamoto, 2013) advocates that the effects of health literacy and empowerment are intertwined on health outcomes. This study aims to test this assumption in the context of health status as a patient outcome. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 302 participants between June and December 2015. The participants’ health literacy (using the NVS and S-TOFHLA tests), empowerment and self-reported health status were assessed. Results: The participants having a high level of patient empowerment and concurrent adequate health literacy (the so-called ‘effective self-managers’) reported better health status compared to patients who had either lower health literacy and/or lower empowerment scores (P < 0.05). Moreover, the meaningfulness (b = 0.053, t(297) = 2.29, P = 0.02) and competence (b = 0.07, t(297) = 2.47, P = 0.01) sub-dimensions of patient empowerment moderated the effect of the NVS on current health status. Conclusion: The study provides evidence for the independence of health literacy and empowerment and partial evidence for their interaction predicting health status. Practice implications: Our findings highlight that health literacy and patient empowerment (in particular its competence and meaningfulness sub-facets) are crucial patient-related variables, to be taken into consideration simultaneously, during screening and health promotion campaigns fostering health status in the general population.
AB - Objective: The Health Empowerment Model (Schulz & Nakamoto, 2013) advocates that the effects of health literacy and empowerment are intertwined on health outcomes. This study aims to test this assumption in the context of health status as a patient outcome. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 302 participants between June and December 2015. The participants’ health literacy (using the NVS and S-TOFHLA tests), empowerment and self-reported health status were assessed. Results: The participants having a high level of patient empowerment and concurrent adequate health literacy (the so-called ‘effective self-managers’) reported better health status compared to patients who had either lower health literacy and/or lower empowerment scores (P < 0.05). Moreover, the meaningfulness (b = 0.053, t(297) = 2.29, P = 0.02) and competence (b = 0.07, t(297) = 2.47, P = 0.01) sub-dimensions of patient empowerment moderated the effect of the NVS on current health status. Conclusion: The study provides evidence for the independence of health literacy and empowerment and partial evidence for their interaction predicting health status. Practice implications: Our findings highlight that health literacy and patient empowerment (in particular its competence and meaningfulness sub-facets) are crucial patient-related variables, to be taken into consideration simultaneously, during screening and health promotion campaigns fostering health status in the general population.
KW - Empowerment
KW - Health Empowerment Model
KW - Health literacy
KW - Health status
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028944667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2017.09.004
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2017.09.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 28899712
AN - SCOPUS:85028944667
SN - 0738-3991
VL - 101
SP - 511
EP - 517
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
IS - 3
ER -