Advertising Primed: How Professional Identity Affects Moral Reasoning

Erin Schauster, Patrick Ferrucci, Edson Tandoc, Tara Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Moral reasoning among media professionals varies. Historically, advertising professionals score lower on the Defining Issues Test (DIT) than their media colleagues in journalism and public relations. However, the extent to which professional identity impacts media professionals’ moral reasoning has yet to be examined. To understand how professional identity influences moral reasoning, if at all, and guided by theories of moral psychology and social identity, 134 advertising practitioners working in the USA participated in an online experiment. While professional identity was not a significant predictor of moral reasoning, an interaction effect between gender and identity priming occurred. This finding suggests that we reconsider moral psychology theory’s explanatory power for media practitioners and consider how the complexity of professional identities in concert with gender and professional training, among other variables, interact to affect moral reasoning. In addition, advertising practitioners participating in this experiment scored higher on the DIT than those tested previously.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-187
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume171
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature B.V.

Keywords

  • Advertising
  • Experiment
  • Identity priming
  • Moral psychology
  • Moral reasoning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Advertising Primed: How Professional Identity Affects Moral Reasoning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this