TY - JOUR
T1 - A tale of two belongings
T2 - social and academic belonging differentially shape academic and psychological outcomes among university students
AU - Lawrie, Smaranda Ioana
AU - Carter, Delwin B.
AU - Nylund-Gibson, Karen
AU - Kim, Heejung S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Lawrie, Carter, Nylund-Gibson and Kim.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The benefits of belonging in academic settings are well established; however, past empirical research has for the most part conflated academic and social belonging. This study utilized latent class analysis (LCA) with a sample of undergraduates (N = 837) to determine whether distinct classes or profiles of belonging exist on a college campus and whether class membership predicts academic and psychological outcomes. Four distinct belonging classes emerged: High Social, High Academic belonging (35%), Low Social, High Academic belonging (15%), High Social, Low Academic belonging (38%), and Low Social, Low Academic belonging (12%). The results show that belonging classes play different roles. For academic outcomes (GPA), academic belonging was important, but not social belonging. For psychological outcomes (stress and self-esteem), both academic and social belonging mattered but academic belonging mattered more. These findings demonstrate that investigating the distinctive roles of academic and social belonging is a fruitful theoretical and applied endeavor.
AB - The benefits of belonging in academic settings are well established; however, past empirical research has for the most part conflated academic and social belonging. This study utilized latent class analysis (LCA) with a sample of undergraduates (N = 837) to determine whether distinct classes or profiles of belonging exist on a college campus and whether class membership predicts academic and psychological outcomes. Four distinct belonging classes emerged: High Social, High Academic belonging (35%), Low Social, High Academic belonging (15%), High Social, Low Academic belonging (38%), and Low Social, Low Academic belonging (12%). The results show that belonging classes play different roles. For academic outcomes (GPA), academic belonging was important, but not social belonging. For psychological outcomes (stress and self-esteem), both academic and social belonging mattered but academic belonging mattered more. These findings demonstrate that investigating the distinctive roles of academic and social belonging is a fruitful theoretical and applied endeavor.
KW - academic belonging
KW - first-generation students
KW - latent class analysis
KW - school belonging
KW - social belonging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85219556994&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1394588
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1394588
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85219556994
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 15
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
M1 - 1394588
ER -