TY - JOUR
T1 - A study of mixed phenotype acute leukemia based on the 2008 world health organization classification
AU - Park, Joonhong
AU - Chae, Hyojin
AU - Kim, Myungshin
AU - Lim, Jihyang
AU - Kim, Yonggoo
AU - Lee, Jaewook
AU - Chung, Nak Gyun
AU - Cho, Bin
AU - Kim, Hack Ki
AU - Lee, Seok
AU - Han, Kyungja
PY - 2010/12
Y1 - 2010/12
N2 - Background : We evaluated the clinical significance of revised 2008 WHO classification needed to diagnose mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL). Methods : A total of 22 MPAL patients, previously diagnosed by applying the scoring system of the European Group for Immunological Classification of Acute Leukemias (EGIL) were reclassified based on the 2008 WHO classification. Results : In 2008 WHO classification, the number of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) required for assigning more than one lineage was markedly decreased, from 26 to 11, compared with that of EGIL. Seventeen of the 22 MPAL patients were reclassified as MPAL with following details: 6 MPAL with t(9;22)(q34;q11.2); BCR-ABU, 1 MPAL with t(v;11q23); MLL rearranged, 7 MPAL, B/Myeloid, not otherwise specified (NOS) and 3 MPAL, T/Myeloid, NOS. Five patients were excluded from MPAL in the revised classification: 4 cytoplasmic myeloperoxidase (cMPO)-negative and 1 CD19-negative. The failure of complete remission achievement and occurrence of relapse were associated with poor prognosis (P=0.0002 and P=0.009, respectively). But the presence of Philadelphia chromsome was not significantly related with patient outcome (P=0.082). One patient with cCD79a, CD20, CD38, cMPO and CD15, whose diagnosis was reclassified from MPAL to AML has survived during the study period. Conclusions : Because of decreased number of mAbs needed, it is possible that acute leukemia panel is designed to include all mAbs required to diagnose MPAL according to 2008 WHO classification. When diagnosing MPAL, it is critical to figure out positivity in either cMPO or CD19, and AML expressing more than 2 lymphoid antigens are considered as MPAL.
AB - Background : We evaluated the clinical significance of revised 2008 WHO classification needed to diagnose mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL). Methods : A total of 22 MPAL patients, previously diagnosed by applying the scoring system of the European Group for Immunological Classification of Acute Leukemias (EGIL) were reclassified based on the 2008 WHO classification. Results : In 2008 WHO classification, the number of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) required for assigning more than one lineage was markedly decreased, from 26 to 11, compared with that of EGIL. Seventeen of the 22 MPAL patients were reclassified as MPAL with following details: 6 MPAL with t(9;22)(q34;q11.2); BCR-ABU, 1 MPAL with t(v;11q23); MLL rearranged, 7 MPAL, B/Myeloid, not otherwise specified (NOS) and 3 MPAL, T/Myeloid, NOS. Five patients were excluded from MPAL in the revised classification: 4 cytoplasmic myeloperoxidase (cMPO)-negative and 1 CD19-negative. The failure of complete remission achievement and occurrence of relapse were associated with poor prognosis (P=0.0002 and P=0.009, respectively). But the presence of Philadelphia chromsome was not significantly related with patient outcome (P=0.082). One patient with cCD79a, CD20, CD38, cMPO and CD15, whose diagnosis was reclassified from MPAL to AML has survived during the study period. Conclusions : Because of decreased number of mAbs needed, it is possible that acute leukemia panel is designed to include all mAbs required to diagnose MPAL according to 2008 WHO classification. When diagnosing MPAL, it is critical to figure out positivity in either cMPO or CD19, and AML expressing more than 2 lymphoid antigens are considered as MPAL.
KW - 2008 WHO classification
KW - Mixed phenotype acute leukemia (mPAL)
KW - Reclassification
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/78651337154
U2 - 10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.525
DO - 10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.525
M3 - Article
C2 - 21157134
AN - SCOPUS:78651337154
SN - 1598-6535
VL - 30
SP - 525
EP - 532
JO - Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine
JF - Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine
IS - 6
ER -