A simulation study of appointment scheduling in outpatient clinics: Open access and overbooking

Sangbok Lee, Daiki Min, Jong Hyun Ryu, Yuehwern Yih

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Patient appointment scheduling (AS) in outpatient clinics is a widely studied subject and plays an important role in facilitating the efficient use of clinical resources and patients’ timely access to quality care. This paper considers two AS systems: open access (OA) and overbooking (OB). Clinics make strategic decisions on selecting an AS system and then make tactical decisions on the efficient or optimal use of the system based on the selection. This study proposes some guidelines for the strategic choice of an AS system. For this purpose, we conduct a discrete-event simulation to compare the two AS systems under various environments. We employ four performance measures for the comparison: overtime work, the proportion of unmet demand, in-clinic waiting times, and the use of appointment time slots. For the analysis, we devise an integrated measure representing a linear combination of the four measures. We divide the analysis into two phases. In the first phase, well-performed OA and OB policies are separately identified, and in the second phase, the two scheduling systems with the identified policies are compared. We find overbooking is more robust to various clinic environments and performs better than open access in general. Along with that result, we additionally suggest some rules for determining best open access and overbooking policies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1459-1473
Number of pages15
JournalSIMULATION
Volume89
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Keywords

  • Appointment scheduling
  • discrete-event simulation
  • healthcare delivery system
  • open access
  • overbooking

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A simulation study of appointment scheduling in outpatient clinics: Open access and overbooking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this