TY - JOUR
T1 - A Novel Magnetic Resonance Quality Assurance Phantom (KMRP-4)
T2 - Multi-Site Comparison With the American College of Radiology Phantom
AU - Kumar, Suchit
AU - Kim, Jong Min
AU - Cha, Jang Gyu
AU - Hwang, Ji Young
AU - Jung, Seung Eun
AU - Lee, Chulhyun
AU - Oh, Chang Hyun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Korean Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Purpose: To propose a novel standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) phantom, here-after called the Korea Magnetic Resonance Phantom-4th edition (KMRP-4). Its related quality control (QC) assessment protocols and its comparison with the American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom and its QC assessment protocols. Materials and Methods: Internally, the KMRP-4 phantom is composed of cubic and tri-angular vessels, brain tissue structures, and a uniform region designed to facilitate a vari-ety of QC protocols. Using magnetic resonance (MR) images of these structures, we quan-titatively evaluated a total of 10 parameters, seven from those of existing ACR protocols (i.e., geometric accuracy, high-contrast spatial resolution, slice thickness accuracy, slice po-sition accuracy, image intensity uniformity, percent signal ghosting, and low-contrast object detectability) and three additional parameters for evaluating vessel conspicuity, brain tissue contrast, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) introduced in the KMRP-4 protocols. Twenty-two MRI systems of 0.32–3.0 T static magnetic field strength were tested using both ACR and KMRP-4 phantoms. Mann–Whitney U-tests were performed on the seven evaluation items of the ACR method to compare KMRP-4 and ACR methods. Results: The results of Mann–Whitney U-test demonstrated that p-values were more than 0.05 for all seven items that could be assessed with both ACR and KMRP-4, indicating similar results between the two methods. Additionally, assessments of vessel conspicuity, brain tissue contrast, and SNR using the KMRP-4 method demonstrated utility of the KMRP-4 phantom. Conclusion: A novel standard phantom and related QC methods were developed to perform objective, observer-independent, and semi-automatic QC tests. Quantitative comparisons of MR images with KMPR-4 and ACR phantoms were performed. Results demonstrated the utility of the newly proposed KMRP-4 phantom and its related QC methods.
AB - Purpose: To propose a novel standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) phantom, here-after called the Korea Magnetic Resonance Phantom-4th edition (KMRP-4). Its related quality control (QC) assessment protocols and its comparison with the American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom and its QC assessment protocols. Materials and Methods: Internally, the KMRP-4 phantom is composed of cubic and tri-angular vessels, brain tissue structures, and a uniform region designed to facilitate a vari-ety of QC protocols. Using magnetic resonance (MR) images of these structures, we quan-titatively evaluated a total of 10 parameters, seven from those of existing ACR protocols (i.e., geometric accuracy, high-contrast spatial resolution, slice thickness accuracy, slice po-sition accuracy, image intensity uniformity, percent signal ghosting, and low-contrast object detectability) and three additional parameters for evaluating vessel conspicuity, brain tissue contrast, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) introduced in the KMRP-4 protocols. Twenty-two MRI systems of 0.32–3.0 T static magnetic field strength were tested using both ACR and KMRP-4 phantoms. Mann–Whitney U-tests were performed on the seven evaluation items of the ACR method to compare KMRP-4 and ACR methods. Results: The results of Mann–Whitney U-test demonstrated that p-values were more than 0.05 for all seven items that could be assessed with both ACR and KMRP-4, indicating similar results between the two methods. Additionally, assessments of vessel conspicuity, brain tissue contrast, and SNR using the KMRP-4 method demonstrated utility of the KMRP-4 phantom. Conclusion: A novel standard phantom and related QC methods were developed to perform objective, observer-independent, and semi-automatic QC tests. Quantitative comparisons of MR images with KMPR-4 and ACR phantoms were performed. Results demonstrated the utility of the newly proposed KMRP-4 phantom and its related QC methods.
KW - ACR phantom
KW - KMRP-4 phantom
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
KW - Quality assurance phantom
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181905819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.13104/imri.2022.1009
DO - 10.13104/imri.2022.1009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85181905819
SN - 2384-1109
VL - 27
SP - 10
EP - 20
JO - Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
IS - 1
ER -