Abstract
In public-health campaign research, 3 prominent theories of persuasion and media effects-elaboration likelihood model (ELM), activation model of information exposure (AMIE), and limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing (LC4MP)-have been used to predict message effectiveness. Although conceptually overlapping, these theories suggest contradictory predictions about individual-level and message-level factors on persuasion outcomes. In this study, we contrast and test competing predictions of antidrug message effectiveness from 3 recent publications that draw on ELM, AMIE, and LC4MP. We use televised antimarijuana messages, young-adult samples, and a multilevel modeling approach. Significant interactions between individual- and message-level factors were found predicting message effectiveness as theory dictates; these results replicate some, but not all of the findings from the aforementioned publications.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 302-330 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Communication Monographs |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2013 |
Keywords
- Antidrug Public Service Announcements
- Elaboration Likelihood Model
- Health Communication
- Multilevel Analysis
- Persuasion