TY - JOUR
T1 - A methodological quality assessment of South Korean nursing research using structural equation modeling in South Korea
AU - Kim, Jung Hee
AU - Shin, Sujin
AU - Park, Jin Hwa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Korean Society of Nursing Science.
PY - 2015/4/1
Y1 - 2015/4/1
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the methodological quality of nursing studies using structural equation modeling in Korea. Methods: Databases of KISS, DBPIA, and National Assembly Library up to March 2014 were searched using the MeSH terms ‘nursing’, ‘structure’, ‘model’. A total of 152 studies were screened. After removal of duplicates and non-relevant titles, 61 papers were read in full. Results: Of the sixty-one articles retrieved, 14 studies were published between 1992 and 2000, 27, between 2001 and 2010, and 20, between 2011 and March 2014. The methodological quality of the review examined varied considerably. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that more rigorous research is necessary to address theoretical identification, two indicator rule, distribution of sample, treatment of missing values, mediator effect, discriminant validity, convergent validity, post hoc model modification, equivalent models issues, and alternative models issues should be undergone. Further research with robust consistent methodological study designs from model identification to model respecification is needed to improve the validity of the research.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the methodological quality of nursing studies using structural equation modeling in Korea. Methods: Databases of KISS, DBPIA, and National Assembly Library up to March 2014 were searched using the MeSH terms ‘nursing’, ‘structure’, ‘model’. A total of 152 studies were screened. After removal of duplicates and non-relevant titles, 61 papers were read in full. Results: Of the sixty-one articles retrieved, 14 studies were published between 1992 and 2000, 27, between 2001 and 2010, and 20, between 2011 and March 2014. The methodological quality of the review examined varied considerably. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that more rigorous research is necessary to address theoretical identification, two indicator rule, distribution of sample, treatment of missing values, mediator effect, discriminant validity, convergent validity, post hoc model modification, equivalent models issues, and alternative models issues should be undergone. Further research with robust consistent methodological study designs from model identification to model respecification is needed to improve the validity of the research.
KW - Korea
KW - Nursing
KW - Nursing research
KW - Review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928943199&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4040/jkan.2015.45.2.159
DO - 10.4040/jkan.2015.45.2.159
M3 - Article
C2 - 25947178
AN - SCOPUS:84928943199
SN - 2005-3673
VL - 45
SP - 159
EP - 168
JO - Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
JF - Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
IS - 2
ER -