TY - JOUR
T1 - A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation
AU - Deci, Edward L.
AU - Ryan, Richard M.
AU - Koestner, Richard
PY - 1999/11
Y1 - 1999/11
N2 - A meta-analysis of 128 studies examined the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. As predicted, engagement-contingent, completion-contingent, and performance-contingent rewards significantly undermined free-choice intrinsic motivation (d = -0.40, -0.36, and -0.28, respectively), as did all rewards, all tangible rewards, and all expected rewards. Engagement-contingent and completion-contingent rewards also significantly undermined self-reported interest (d = -0.15, and -0.17), as did all tangible rewards and all expected rewards. Positive feedback enhanced both free-choice behavior (d = 0.33) and self-reported interest (d = 0.31). Tangible rewards tended to be more detrimental for children than college students, and verbal rewards tended to be less enhancing for children than college students. The authors review 4 previous meta-analyses of this literature and detail how this study's methods, analyses, and results differed from the previous ones.
AB - A meta-analysis of 128 studies examined the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. As predicted, engagement-contingent, completion-contingent, and performance-contingent rewards significantly undermined free-choice intrinsic motivation (d = -0.40, -0.36, and -0.28, respectively), as did all rewards, all tangible rewards, and all expected rewards. Engagement-contingent and completion-contingent rewards also significantly undermined self-reported interest (d = -0.15, and -0.17), as did all tangible rewards and all expected rewards. Positive feedback enhanced both free-choice behavior (d = 0.33) and self-reported interest (d = 0.31). Tangible rewards tended to be more detrimental for children than college students, and verbal rewards tended to be less enhancing for children than college students. The authors review 4 previous meta-analyses of this literature and detail how this study's methods, analyses, and results differed from the previous ones.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033220501&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
DO - 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
M3 - Review article
C2 - 10589297
AN - SCOPUS:0033220501
SN - 0033-2909
VL - 125
SP - 627
EP - 668
JO - Psychological Bulletin
JF - Psychological Bulletin
IS - 6
ER -