A Controversy that Never Happened: Ancient and Modern Concepts of Opinion, Knowledge, and Information-Seeking Behavior

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter traces the distinction between knowledge and opinion from Plato to contemporary social science and shows how ancient thinking is linked to modern conceptualizations of health-related knowledge and its consequences for health behaviors. While Plato was concerned with how a human can distinguish his own knowledge from his opinions, and with the role that certainty plays therein, contemporary social science is concerned with differentiating humans’ subjective and objective knowledge from an observer position. Elements of these distinctions find their way into a model of the complex relationships between health information seeking, subjective health knowledge, health literacy, and empowerment to explain health behavior. The sketch shows that ancient philosophy can help understand and conceptualize contemporary variable-oriented modeling.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLogic, Argumentation and Reasoning
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media B.V.
Pages199-208
Number of pages10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Publication series

NameLogic, Argumentation and Reasoning
Volume2
ISSN (Print)2214-9120
ISSN (Electronic)2214-9139

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014.

Keywords

  • Health literacy and empowerment
  • Information-seeking behavior
  • Knowledge–opinion
  • Subjective–objective knowledge

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Controversy that Never Happened: Ancient and Modern Concepts of Opinion, Knowledge, and Information-Seeking Behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this